检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东科技大学文法学院,山东青岛266510 [2]长春市朝阳区人民检察院,吉林长春130021
出 处:《当代法学》2008年第6期18-22,共5页Contemporary Law Review
摘 要:近年来,肇始于西方的刑事和解成为了我国刑事法理论界和实务界研究的热点,司法机关更是对其进行了试点并取得了一定的成绩。由于对刑事和解内涵的把握存在一定的偏差,实践中司法机关大多把金钱赔偿作为实现加害人与被害人和解的唯一手段,致使公众对刑事和解不甚了解。以恢复正义理论为视角,从提倡和解手段的多样性、鼓励社区参加刑事和解程序和设立司法机关监督下的独立的调解机构等方面入手,对完善我国司法实践中的刑事和解大有裨益。In recent years, Victim - Offender Reconciliation (VOR) hich comes from the west becomes a "hot issue"both in the theoretical and practical circles of criminal law. Moreover, the judicial organ puts the system into practice which has made some achievements. However , due to some misunderstanding on the meaning of VOR , in practice, the judicial organs take money - payment as the only means of VOR which make the public misunderstand the system. On the perspective of the theory of restorative justice, it is useful for perfecting the practice on VOR in China by advocating the diversity of means, encouraging active engagement of community and establishing independent department supervised by the judicial organs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.97.63