检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔丽[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁警官高等专科学校法学部,辽宁大连116036
出 处:《辽宁警专学报》2008年第6期7-10,共4页Journal of Liaoning Police Academy
摘 要:尽管国家法律法规一再明令禁止,但直至现代法制已形成与发展的今日,刑讯逼供现象仍然屡禁不止。各地公安机关都在为清除这一公害作出了不懈努力,在一定范围内取得了良好的效果。那么,在我国能从根本上治理刑讯逼供吗?无论是从理性主义、人道主义、正当程序主义等哲学基础方面进行的分析,还是于现实的人文基础、经济基础、法治环境基础和社会发展基础进行的分析,都能够得出刑讯逼供可治理的结论。但是刑讯逼供的治理也绝不是一蹴而就的,刑讯逼供的治理一定是一个渐进的过程。Despite the state laws and regulations repeatedly banned, until the existing of modem legal system in the development of today, the phenomenon of torture is still repeated. All over the public security organs have made unremitting efforts in a certain range in order to remove the public hazards and achieved good results. So, in our country, can we govern the extoting confessions by torture fundamentally? Whether to analyze from the rational, humanitarian, due process, and other aspects of the philosophical foundation, or based on the reality of the humanities foundation, economic foundation, the rule of law - based environment and social development, can we come to the conclusion that extorting confessions by torture may be governed. However, the management of extorting confessions by torture is never easy, it must be a gradual process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117