检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:诸大建[1]
出 处:《中国科学院院刊》2008年第6期520-530,共11页Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(70673069);教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目(批准号05JZD00018);教育部哲学社会科学应急项目(2008JYJ031)的资助
摘 要:当前,随着生态环境问题变得日益严重,人们越来越多地开始关注和讨论起生态经济学。在国内学术界,通常把生态经济学理解为是用主流经济学的理论与方法来解释和解决生态环境问题的应用型学问。但是在国际上,生态经济学是要反思主流经济学的理论与方法,重建有关经济增长、社会公平、生态规模的新的总体性发展理论与行动原则,因此被认为是可持续发展的经济学和管理学。本文概括了20世纪70年代以来国际生态经济学的主要研究成果,指出生态经济学与当前作为主流的新古典经济学的5方面的差异。在此基础上,指出研究生态经济学对于中国未来从经济增长走向科学发展的理论意义与政策意义。At the present, as the problem of the ecological environments becomes serious day by day, Ecological Economics is paid more and more attention to and discussed. While it is often understood as a field of applied type in academic circles in China using theories and methods of mainstream economics to explain and solve the issues of ecological environments, Ecological Economics in the eyes of international researchers, is to rethink the theories and method of mainstream economics, and rebuild a new comprehensive development theory and action principles towards economic growth, society justice and ecological scale, and therefore regarded as economics and management science of sustainable development. This paper, by summarizing the main achievements of ecological economics research since the 1970s in the world, identifies the five differences of Ecological Economics from New Classic Economics as mainstream, and on this basis pointes out the theoretical and policy significance of the research of ecological economics for the transition of China from economic growth to scientific development.
分 类 号:F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学] X22[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15