检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省晋江市市委组织部,福建晋江362200 [2]华侨大学外事办公室,福建泉州362021
出 处:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第4期66-71,共6页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
摘 要:民事诉讼中的审前程序在司法中起着十分重要的作用。然而,由于现行法律法规关于法官在民事诉讼审前程序中地位的有关规定存在缺陷,使得审前程序的收集证据、整理争点、促进和解等价值功能不能得到很好的实现,因此,在司法改革的浪潮中聚焦法官在审前程序中的地位,通过采取预审和裁判相分离、合理分配诉讼各方主体的权利等措施,并突出法官在审前程序中促进当事人和解的作用,以实现民事诉讼审前程序所特有的价值。The pretrial procedure in civil action plays an important role in lawsuit. However, due to the faults of the regulations on the judge's position in the pretrial procedure of the present civil action, the values of the pretrial procedure of the civil action, such as collecting evidence, settling disputes, boosting compromise, and so on, could not be well reached. Therefore, in the process of judicatory reform, it is necessary to focus on judge's part in the pretrial procedure, to take measures of separating the inquiry and judgment, distributing the rights of the principle parts, and setting some relevant systems, so as to perfect the pretrial procedure in civil action.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188