浅议我国民事缺席审判制度之完善  

The Innovation on System of Civil Default Judgment

作　　者：曾琼[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第6期56-59,共4页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：湖南省社科基金项目"民事诉讼中弱势群体人权保护研究"(0604034A)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：缺席审判制度是一项重要的民事诉讼制度。该制度在保护公民的合法权益、提高诉讼效率、保障民事审判权的正确行使等方面都有重要作用。但是,由于我国民事诉讼法规定过于简单、笼统,理论认识和审判实践中也有不少问题,因此有必要在端正理论认识的基础上,针对缺席审理和缺席判决的不同情境,以修改民诉法为契机,分别设置相应的程序,完善我国缺席审判制度。The system of judgment by default is an very important part in the civil procedure systems, which plays an important role in protecting peoples ＇ legitimate benefits, promoting justice efficiency, obligating the jurisdiction and so on. Because of the excessively simple and unclear rules leading to so many problems in theory and practice of judgement, based on the rectified theory, we must setup suitable procedure for innovating the active system of judgment by default under the different situations of judgement and verdict by the chance of amending the civil procedure law.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 缺席审理 缺席判决 当事人 辩论主义 

分 类 号：DF71[政治法律—诉讼法学]