我国行政复议与行政诉讼程序衔接关系的现状及检讨  被引量:3

China's Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Proceedings Convergence between the Current Situation and Review

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陶元峰[1] 

机构地区:[1]甘肃联合大学政法系,甘肃兰州730000

出  处:《甘肃联合大学学报(社会科学版)》2008年第5期34-36,共3页Journal of Gansu Lianhe University:Social Sciences

摘  要:我国行政复议与行政诉讼程序衔接关系类型繁多,设置缺乏统一标准,既不利于行政纠纷的及时化解和公民合法权益的有效维护,甚至还会引发行政权与司法权的相互侵蚀。应当大力推行自由选择型、逐步取消复议终局型、重新设定复议前置型、严格限定迳行起诉型的模式。My administrative reconsideration and administrative proceedings is that there were different types of convergence between install a lack of unified standards, which is not conductive to promptly resolve administrative disputes and citizens to effectively safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests, or even the right to trigger the jurisdiction of the mutual erosion. A vigorous promotion of freedom of choice,should be widespread and reset the phasing out of the final review the prosecution strictly limited.

关 键 词:行政复议 行政诉讼 程序衔接 检讨 

分 类 号:D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象