两种脱敏剂防治固定义齿基牙牙本质过敏的疗效观察  

Clinical observation of two desensitizer on treatment dentine hypersensitivity of vital pulp abutment teeth

作　　者：张伟一 唐震宇 

机构地区：[1]桂林市口腔医院,广西桂林541001

出　　处：《中国民康医学》2008年第24期2900-2901,共2页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health

摘　　要：目的：探讨评价Gluma脱敏剂和氟保护剂对全冠活髓基牙预备后牙本质过敏症的防治效果。方法：将125例（共268颗基牙）行冠桥固定修复的患者随机分为Gluma脱敏剂组、氟保护剂组、75％NaF组（对照组）三组，所有基牙采用暂时冠修复、氧化锌丁香油酚粘固剂粘固。7～10天后试戴修复体时，观察治疗效果，并进行统计学分析。结果：经三种药物处理过的基牙过敏症状均有明显改善，Gluma脱敏剂组（有效率94．51％）和氟保护剂组（有效率91．11％）的疗效明显优于对照组（有效率54．02％，P〈0．01），而Gluma脱敏剂组和氟保护剂组间则无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。结论：Gluma脱敏剂与氟保护剂可以有效预防全冠活髓基牙预备后牙本质过敏症的发生。Objective： To study and evaluate the effect preventing dentine hypersensitivity by using Gluma^TM or Fluor Protector on the prepared vital pulp abutment teeth of the crown.Methods： 125 cases,268 prepared vital pulp abutment teeth, were randomly divided into three groups： Experimental groups treated with the Gluma^TM and Fluor Protector, and control group treated with 75 % NaF. Then the results were analyzed using statistics software. Results： Significant differences were found between experimental groups and the control group after 7- 10 days（ P 〈 0. O1 ）. But no significant differences was found between experimental groups treated with the GlumaTM and Fluor Protector（ P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion： The effect of preventing dental hypersensitiveness by using Gluma^TM and Fluor Protector on the prepared vital pulp abutment teeth of the erown is ideal.

关 键 词：牙本质过敏症 GLUMA脱敏剂 氟保护剂 牙体预备 活髓基牙 

分 类 号：R783.6[医药卫生—口腔医学]