检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐昀[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2009年第2期59-63,共5页Hebei Law Science
基 金:刘立霞教授主持的河北省社会科学研究项目"刑事人身危险性研究"(200804016)的成果之一
摘 要:排除品格证据存在价值与事实的理由,由于品格证据立基于现代心理学的人格—行为理论,事实理由往往被忽视,但社会建构论心理学秉持的人格的建构性解构了这一理论。品格证据应该以社会建构论心理学为理论基础,并以向善的建构作为品格证据规则的建构理念,以品格原则上无相关性、但行为人的好品格具有相关性而坏品格不具有相关性作为建构原则。品格证据排除规则具有重大的法治价值,应该慎重对待当前品格证据运用的扩张之势。There are values and fact reasons in excluding character evidence, and the fact reason is often overlooked because of the character evidence is based on the theory of personality-behavior of modem psychology, but the constructive personality which holds by social constructionist psychology deconstructs the theory. Character evidence should be based on social constructionist psychology, so the construction of rules of character evidence should be based on the idea of "construction to goodness", and the principles are character evidence is irrelative in principle, but good character is relative and the bad is not. The rule of excluding character evidence has great values to rule of law, we should take the expansive use trend of character evidence seriously.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249