全球化视野下的中俄与德日犯罪论体系  

Criminology System of Sino-Russia and Germany-Japan in Perspective of Globalization

作　　者：何秉松[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2009年第1期3-7,共5页Journal of National Prosecutors College

摘　　要：目前国内学者对犯罪理论体系的观点很多,但是从整体来看,主要存在"刑法知识的去苏俄化"(德日化)和反对"刑法知识的去苏俄化"(德日化)这两种根本对立的观点。前一种观点已得到越来越多的认同和支持,形成一股强有力的思潮。本文从两大犯罪论体系的起源论起,论述了费尔巴哈的Tabestand理论及作为其分支的德日与中俄犯罪论体系的不同,着重分析了德日和苏俄犯罪论体系中存在的缺陷,并大力倡导德日刑法中费尔巴哈的犯罪论体系和俄罗斯刑法中的塔甘采夫理论。最后指出中国现存的犯罪论体系的缺陷,并提出在全球化的新时代,运用系统论的方法解决犯罪构成理论中的问题。Opinions about the criminology system vary in Chinese mainland; however, on the whole two dominating views are opposite to each other whether the criminology should be de-soviet-russianization or not. The former has been a forceful trend of thought owing to increased approval and support. From the origins of two main systems of criminology, the Tabestand theory initiated by Feuerbach and Germany-Japan system as one of its branch differentiates from that of Sino-Russia. The Feuerbach doctrine in Germany-Japan criminology and Tagantsev theory in Russian criminal law should be exercised and the defects in present Chinese criminology system should be mended. In conclusion, the problems in crime constitution theory should be solved by using the system theory in this new era of globalization.

关 键 词：德日 中俄 犯罪论体系 比较研究 系统论 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]