检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶伟明[1] 刘远成[1] 陈秀琴[1] 沈奎[1] 邴卫平[1] 曾新晨[2]
机构地区:[1]安徽省合肥市第一人民医院肛肠科,安徽合肥230061 [2]广州中山大学中山医学院2004级八年制
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2008年第12期25-26,共2页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:为探讨两种不同方法在治疗各期内痔中的应用,对94例Ⅱ、Ⅲ期内痔采用自动痔疮套扎术(RPH),并与同期行消痔灵硬化治疗者进行对照分析。结果显示,对Ⅱ期内痔两组治疗痔核脱出、出血、术后3个月肛窥镜观察结果差异无显著性,对Ⅲ期内痔两组治疗在痔核脱出、出血、术后3个月肛窥镜观察结果差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。结果表明,对Ⅲ期内痔治疗RPH术明显优于消痔灵硬化注射。The objective of this study was to assess the application of the two methods in the stage Ⅱ & Ⅲ of internal hemorrhoids. The 94 patients were subjected to the Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids(RPH), and compared with the controlled group which were subjected XiaoZhiLing injection for sclerosis treatment at same time. Results showed that in the treatment of prolapse of hemorrhoid, hemorrhage , as well the anoendoscope findings later 3 months after operation for Ⅱ stage hemorrhoids there was not significant difference( P 〉0.05) ,while for Ⅲ stage hemorrhoids there was significant difference( P 〈0.05) between two groups. These results indicate that for Ⅲ stage internal hemorrhoids RPH is greatly superior to XiaoZhiLing sclerosis therapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28