检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周爽英[1] 马绪臣[1] 张刚[1] 曹采方[1]
机构地区:[1]北京医科大学口腔医学院
出 处:《中华口腔医学杂志》1998年第2期70-72,共3页Chinese Journal of Stomatology
基 金:国家自然科学基金
摘 要:目的评价根尖片数字减影处理系统对微小病损检出的准确率。方法于干燥下颌骨牙槽嵴区制作0.2mm3~1.9mm3微小病损共72个,在制作病损前后摄定位根尖片,分别用数字减影方法与直接读片法对这些随机分布的微小病损进行检测。结果对于0.2mm3~0.5mm3的微小病损两种方法的检出率均低于50.0%。对于0.7mm3病损直接读片法检出率为38.7%,而DSR法为57.5%(P<0.01),对于0.9mm3病损,DSR法和直接读片法的检测准确率分别为89.3%和57.3%(P<0.01)。结论DSR系统对微小骨病损的检测能力明显优于直接读片法。Objective To employ digital subtraction radiography (DSR) system developed by our school and co ordinative unit, for diagnosis of small artificial alveolar bone lesions, in order to evaluate the system.Methods Seventy two 0.2—0.9mm 3 lesions were produced in premolar and molar areas of the dry human mandibles. The reference and subsequent radiographs were taken before and after lesions being made. The small lesions were detected by conventional radiographs and by DSR method respectively. Results As for 0.2—0.5 mm 3 lesions, the detections by both DSR and conventional methods were less than 50%. As for 0.7 mm 3 lesions, the detection by DSR and conventional methods were 57.5% and 38.7%, respectively ( P <0.01). As for 0.9mm 3 lesions, the accuracy of the detection by DSR and conventional methods was 89.3% and 57.3% ( P <0.01).Conclusion The detectability of small alveolar bone lesions by DSR system was obviously superior to the conventional method.
分 类 号:R782.140.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.183.244