民事诉讼和解效力之研究  

A Study of Efficacy of Compromise in Civil Procedure

作　　者：包冰锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学继续教育学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《内江师范学院学报》2009年第1期36-39,共4页Journal of Neijiang Normal University

摘　　要：民事诉讼和解一经成立,便与确定判决有同一的效力。但是,和解与确定判决有同一的效力,是否效果全部相同,不无疑问。诉讼和解的效力应当包括羁束力、形式的确定力、执行力和形成力。从和解是当事人自主解决纠纷的方式出发,为保障当事人对瑕疵和解申请救济的途径,应当否定诉讼和解的既判力。Once if a compromise in the civil procedure is reached, it will be taken into effect as a verdict. In spite of that, it is still in argument if the two can lead to the same result. The effect of a compromise in the civil procedure should involve the restriction power, means determined power, executive power and formal power. From the perspective of the compromise as a means of settling a dispute, the judge should deny the verdict power of compromise in the civil procedure in order to ensure the party to apply for salvation for some flaw in compromise.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 和解 既判力 执行力 形成力 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]