检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]韩山师范学院教育系,广东潮州521041 [2]西南大学心理学院,重庆400715
出 处:《心理科学》2009年第1期74-76,66,共4页Journal of Psychological Science
摘 要:该文旨在比较我们新编的自我监控量表是否优于Snyder自我监控量表。在360名大学生被试中用两种量表筛选出高自我监控者,通过比较他们(1)对情境线索的敏感性,(2)行为的控制源,以及(3)社会适应三个效标上的表现,比较新旧自我监控量表的优劣。研究结果显示新自我监控量比Snyder自我监控量表在对内在线索敏感性方面,在行为的内在控制方面比较旧量表好;在社会适应性方面,在艾森克人格量表中的精神质和神经质子量表上,得分要明显地低。说明新量表比旧量表有较大的改善。This paper aimed to judge whether the new self-monitoring scale is better than Snyder' s self-monitoring scale by comparing the high self-monitors got from the two scales. From 360 subjects, all college students, two high self-monitors were screened and compared in terms of: (1)sensitiveness to the inner and outer cues, (2)the focus of control, and (3) social adaptability. The results showed that the new self-monitoring scale is better than Snyder' s in sensitiveness to the inner cures, and in the inner control of behavior. In social adaptability, the high self-monitors from the new scale got lower scores than the ones from the old scale on the Psychoticism and Neuroticism subscale of the Eysenek Personality Questinnaire. These results suggest that the new scale is better than the old one.
分 类 号:B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学] G633.6[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112