检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省温州医学院附属口腔医院口腔内科,温州325027 [2]浙江省瑞安人民医院口腔科,温州325205
出 处:《口腔医学》2009年第1期4-6,共3页Stomatology
摘 要:目的观察应用Protaper手动镍钛锉和不锈钢K锉在慢性根尖周炎的一次性根管治疗术后的反应及远期疗效。方法将需要根管治疗的95例患者106颗磨牙随机分为Protaper手动锉组51颗牙和不锈钢K锉组55颗牙。分别进行Pmtaper手动锉和不锈钢K锉进行根管预备后,一次性根管充填。结果治疗后1~7dProtaper手动锉组术后反应率较不锈钢K锉组低(P〈0.05),远期疗效两组无明显差异(P〉0.05)。结论Protaper手动锉用于一次性根管治疗术后反应较少,疗效可靠。Objective To compare the postobturation of pain and the therapeutic effects of hand-used Ni-Ti ProTaper instrument and stainless steel K-files in single-visit root canal therapy.Methods 106 teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups. All teeth were treated with root canal therapy in single-visit. Hand-used Ni-Ti ProTaper instrument and stainless steel K-files were used respectively in treatment. Results The pain intensity of the first group was significantly lower than that of the second group within 1 - 7 days( P 〈 0.05). After 12 months, the efficiency rates of the two groups were not significantly different( P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Root canal therapy using hand-used Ni-Ti ProTaper instrument can significantly decrease postoperative pain.
关 键 词:根尖周炎 PROTAPER手动镍钛锉 一次性根管治疗
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.45