检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连海事大学法学院
出 处:《环球法律评论》2009年第1期110-118,共9页Global Law Review
基 金:国家社会科学规划基金资助项目“海上侵权行为法研究”(项目批准号:06CFX019)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:许多国家的船舶保险条款中碰撞责任条款规定:当碰撞两船没有船舶援引责任限制时,保险人与被保险人之间碰撞责任的确定适用交叉责任原则。但海上保险理论界和实务界对于援引责任限制的情形下是否适用单一责任制却存在误解。本文通过具体案例中保险人责任的演算,论证了单一责任制适用的不合理性,并提出了"不完全交叉责任制"的理论。In RDC of the hull clauses of the international marine insurance practice, it is provided that unless the liability of the owners of one or both such vessels becomes limited by law, claims under the collision liability clause shall be settled between the insured and the insurer according to the principle of cross liabilities. However, there is a dispute as to whether the principle of single liability shall be applied in circumstance in which one or two vessels invoke limitation of liability. The authors demonstrate how to calculate liability of insurers (or P&I Club) through a case study and conclude that the application of the principle of singe liability can lead to unreasonable result. Instead, the new theory of "imperfect principle of cross liability" will be useful in resolving such disputes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249