《阴符经考异》作者非朱熹、蔡元定蠡测  

A Preliminary Researching about the Author of The Textual Research on Yinfu was nither Zhu-xi nor Cai-YuanDing

作　　者：杨燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学系,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《泉州师范学院学报》2009年第1期34-36,共3页Journal of Quanzhou Normal University

基　　金：福建省社科联规划项目(2008B2063);泉州市社科联规划项目(2008B-YZ05)

摘　　要：王铁先生为上海古籍出版社和安徽教育出版社2002所版的《朱子全书》之《阴符经注》的校点说明中,扼要阐述了将此文以《阴符经注》而不以《阴符经考异》收录的原因,并提出《阴符经考异》其实是蔡元定的《阴符经注》的观点。本文在作了进一步的考订后认为,王铁先生的论证不可谓不力,但其结论还是未能令人信服。现在通常所说的朱熹《阴符经考异》,最初名为《阴符经注》,它既不是朱熹作的,也不是蔡元定作、朱熹校正的。In the collation of The Comment on Yinfu, Mr Wang-Tie interpreted why he usett tins tltte but not The Textual Research on Yinfu in the collected edition about Zhu-Zi, he suggested that The Textual Research on Yinfu actually was the book which named The Comment on Yinfu, the true author was Cai-YuanDing, and this book was collated by Zhu-Xi. But after in depth research, this paper considers that the name of The Textual Research on Yin f u actully named The Comment on Yin fu, and the author was not Zhu-Xi, just as what Mr Wang suggested. Nevertheless, being different with Mr Wang, the oaoer considers this atricle through this book was not wrote by Cai-YuanDing nor collated by Zhu-Xi.

关 键 词：《阴符经考异》 朱熹 蔡元定 

分 类 号：B244.7[哲学宗教—中国哲学]