检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东广州市精神病医院司法鉴定科,510370 [2]四川大学基础医学与法医学院法医精神病学教研室
出 处:《临床精神医学杂志》2009年第1期31-32,33,共3页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
摘 要:目的:通过对癫所致精神障碍违法者犯罪学特征的分析,探讨刑事责任能力评定的主要因素。方法:采用自编鉴定案例登记表记录132例癫所致精神障碍违法者的犯罪学特征,按照有无刑事责任能力分两组进行犯罪学特征对照分析,应用Spearman相关法分析刑事责任能力与犯罪学特征的相关性,以刑事责任能力作为因变量,以犯罪学特征作为自变量进行Logistic回归分析。结果:无刑事责任能力组与有刑事责任能力组相比,在作案前有无诱发事件、作案动机、作案目的、作案后是否自称遗忘和作案后的反应5个方面的差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。Spearman相关分析显示,有无刑事责任能力与作案动机(r=-0.464)、作案目的(r=-0.439)、诱发事件(r=-0.299)、作案后的反应(r=-0.226)、自称遗忘(r=0.231)之间存在显著相关。Logistic回归分析显示,作案动机(OR=0.581,P=0.004)、作案目的(OR=0.822,P=0.015)两个因素进入方程。结论:在癫所致精神障碍违法者的犯罪学特征中,作案动机和作案目的是评定刑事责任能力的主要因素,在今后的鉴定工作中应给予充分重视。Objective: To explore the main effective factors between the criminological characteristics and the capacity of criminal responsibility in offenders with mental disorder due to epilepsy. Method:The criminological characteristics of 132 offenders with mental disorder due to epilepsy were collected by the assessment record designed by ourselves and the criminological characteristics were researched by control analysis according to the different capacities of criminal responsibility group. Then the Spearman correlation analysis and the Logistic regression analysis were conducted with the significantly different criminological characteristics as the independent variables and capacity of criminal responsibility as dependent variable. Results:No capacity of criminal responsibility group showed significant differences in the following five aspects between them : provocation before offence ( P=0. 000 ), offence motivation ( P = 0. 000 ) , offence aim ( P = 0. 000 ) , forgetting all af- ter offence or not( P = 0. 009), further reaction after offence( P = 0. 007 ). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the assessment of capacity of criminal responsibility correlated with the following factors : offence motivation ( r = - O. 464 ) , offence aim ( r = - 0. 439 ), provocation before offence ( r = - 0. 299 ), further reaction after offence ( r = - 0. 266 ) , forgetting all after offence or not ( r = 0. 231 ) , and the Logistic regression analysis indicated that offence motivation( OR =0. 581, P = 0. 004 ) and offence aim ( OR =0. 822, P = 0. 015 ) remained in the regression equation. Conclusion:Offence motivation and offence aim were the main effective factors between the criminological characteristics and the capacity of criminal responsibility in offenders with mental disorder due to epilepsy ,which indicated that more attentions should be paid in forensic psychiatry assessment in future.
分 类 号:R749.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49