Data analysis of flow of litigation into different channels in China  

中国诉讼分流的数据分析(英文)

作　　者：朱景文 

机构地区：[1]Law School,Renmin University of China

出　　处：《Social Sciences in China》2009年第1期100-118,共19页中国社会科学（英文版）

摘　　要：Following reform and opening up, China witnessed a rapid increase in legal cases, but the rate of increase has undergone a marked decline since 1997. The reasons this has occurred in a period of social transformation are threefold： a non-litigious dispute-settling mechanism, judicial policy and the credibility of the courts. A data analysis of the average annual rate of growth, the correlation coefficient and the respective proportions of solutions under the litigious and the non-litigious dispute-settling mechanisms indicates that the slowing of the rate of growth of litigation has been accompanied by a decrease in the role of the people＇s mediation system and the economic arbitration system. However, it is the strengthening of administrative dispute-settling mechanisms, a judicial policy of not accepting cases, the reform of litigation fees and a series of institutional cbnstructs aimed at judicial corruption that has curbed the rapid increase of legal cases.改革开放以来,中国诉讼数量迅速增长,但1997年以后诉讼增长率明显降低。对于在社会转型期诉讼增长率不升反降的原因,可以通过非诉讼纠纷解决机制、司法政策和法院公信力三个方面来分析纠纷的走向。关于诉讼与非诉讼纠纷解决机制的年均增长率、相关系数和比重的数据分析表明,中国诉讼增长率的下降也伴随着人民调解和经济仲裁作用的下降,但行政解决机制的增强、不受理的司法政策、诉讼费用改革以及针对司法腐败的一系列制度性建设,遏制了诉讼量的快速增长。

关 键 词：rate of growth of litigation non-litigious dispute-settling mechanism judicial policy credibility of the court 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]