检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨一峰[1] 钱忠豪[1] 顾宇参[1] 许峥[1] 蒋长英[1]
机构地区:[1]上海医科大学附属中山医院
出 处:《中华老年医学杂志》1998年第2期100-102,共3页Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
摘 要:目的探讨老年癌症骨转移患者内照射治疗的剂量效应。方法对用153钐-乙二胺四甲撑膦酸(153Sm-EDTMP)治疗而缓解癌性骨痛的老年患者40例作骨辐射吸收剂量分析和疗效观察,并以老年前期组40例癌性骨痛治疗者为对照。结果老年组及老年前期两组在尿排泄率、骨摄取率及骨累积活度的差异无显著性;其疗效分别为45%及60%,老年组稍低于老年前期组,但差异无显著性(均为P>0.05);红骨髓辐射吸收剂量相似,分别为219.9±68.2及206.3±64.7cGy,均在安全剂量范围(285cGy)内。结论增龄不影响老年人153Sm-EDTMP治疗缓解癌性骨痛的剂量效应。Objective To study the doseresponse of internal radiation therapy in aged patients with osseous metastases. Methods Samarium153ethylenediamine tetramethyline phosphonic acid(153 SmEDTMP) was administrated to a group of 40 patients aged ≥60y and another group aged from 45y to 59y as control for palliating painful bone metastases. Comparative analyses were made on the doseresponse rate and absorbed dose of bone radiation between the two groups. Results Differences of urine excretion rate, skeletal uptake rate and accumulated skeletal activities between the two groups were of no significance (P>005). The response rate was 45% (age≥60y) and 60% (age from 45y to 59y) respectively. Although the elder group was lower in response the difference was of no significance (P>005). The average radiation absorbed dose by red marrow was similar in the two groups. Both were within the safe dose range. Conclusions Aging has no influence on doseresponse in 153 SmEDTMP therapy to painful bone metastases patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195