中学生复原力测评的三视角研究  被引量:7

Research on Three Perspectives Measurement of Middle School Students’ Resilience

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:高翔[1] 郑日昌[2] 

机构地区:[1]中国民航管理干部学院,北京100102 [2]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875

出  处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2009年第1期1-4,53,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

摘  要:目的:从不同评定角度测评中学生复原力。方法:通过开放式访谈、初测问卷因素分析,形成中学生复原力量表(简版)学生自评量表、家长评定量表、教师评定量表,考察其同质性信度、重测信度及结构效度。同时,在此基础上构建中学生复原力测评的三视角MTMM模型。结果:中学生复原力量表(简版)学生自评量表、家长评定量表及教师评定量表均具有良好的信、效度,且从三视角测评中学生复原力的MTMM模型拟合较好,与理论构想较为一致。结论:证实中学生复原力量表四种特质的合理性,说明在复原力评定上不同评定角度存在着偏见的影响,即方法效应明显,这也验证了多角度评定的必要性。Objective: To measure middle school students' resilience from different views. Methods: Middle School Students' Resilience Scale (Self-assessment, Parent-assessment and teacher-assessment) was developed by open interviewing, and exploring factor analysis, and its reliability, re-test reliability and construct validity were analyzed. And then three perspectives MTMM model was constructed. Results: It suggested that Middle School Students' Resilience Scale (Self-assessment, Parent-assessment and teacher-assessment) had good reliability and validity. And the construct validity of MTMM was good as well. Conclusion: It is concluded that the four characteristics from each branch scale are rational. The analysis of convergent validity and discriminative validity indicated that there exists bias against the assessment of resilience, therefore it is necessary to assess them from various angles.

关 键 词:中学生 复原力 同质性信度 重测信度 结构效度 MTMM模型 

分 类 号:R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象