检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国民航管理干部学院,北京100102 [2]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2009年第1期1-4,53,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
摘 要:目的:从不同评定角度测评中学生复原力。方法:通过开放式访谈、初测问卷因素分析,形成中学生复原力量表(简版)学生自评量表、家长评定量表、教师评定量表,考察其同质性信度、重测信度及结构效度。同时,在此基础上构建中学生复原力测评的三视角MTMM模型。结果:中学生复原力量表(简版)学生自评量表、家长评定量表及教师评定量表均具有良好的信、效度,且从三视角测评中学生复原力的MTMM模型拟合较好,与理论构想较为一致。结论:证实中学生复原力量表四种特质的合理性,说明在复原力评定上不同评定角度存在着偏见的影响,即方法效应明显,这也验证了多角度评定的必要性。Objective: To measure middle school students' resilience from different views. Methods: Middle School Students' Resilience Scale (Self-assessment, Parent-assessment and teacher-assessment) was developed by open interviewing, and exploring factor analysis, and its reliability, re-test reliability and construct validity were analyzed. And then three perspectives MTMM model was constructed. Results: It suggested that Middle School Students' Resilience Scale (Self-assessment, Parent-assessment and teacher-assessment) had good reliability and validity. And the construct validity of MTMM was good as well. Conclusion: It is concluded that the four characteristics from each branch scale are rational. The analysis of convergent validity and discriminative validity indicated that there exists bias against the assessment of resilience, therefore it is necessary to assess them from various angles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15