中朝话语标记语“什么”与“■”的语用功能对比  

A Comparative Study on Pragmatic Functions of Discourse Markers "Shenme" in Chinese and "Mue" in Korean

作　　者：陈希[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《读与写（教育教学刊）》2009年第2期37-38,共2页Read and Write

摘　　要：话语标记语是指没有实质性语义或者实质性语义丧失,用于谈话中,使上下文关系明确,说话人主观意图得到有效表现的插入语。话语标记语方面的研究是语用学研究的一个新兴课题。本文以中朝日常会话中的语料为基础,从语用的角度出发,对中朝话语标记语"什么"和"■"的语用功能进行了分析和比较。This paper aims to make a comparative study on the pragmatic functions between 'shenme'in Chinese and 'mue'in Korean both meaning 'what'.When they are used as discourse markers,they all lost their substantive significance and show some similar pragmatic functions like alternative functions,etc.And because of the two languages and cultural differences,they also have their unique pragmatic functions like functions of getting topic back of'shenme',etc.

关 键 词：中朝 话语标记语 语用功能 什么 对比 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]