检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢进[1] 高正琴[1] 冯育芳[1] 岳秉飞[1] 贺争鸣[1]
机构地区:[1]中国药品生物制品检定所实验动物质量检测室,北京100050
出 处:《中国比较医学杂志》2009年第2期36-38,共3页Chinese Journal of Comparative Medicine
基 金:北京市科委公益应用项目D07080200720701
摘 要:目的通过常用的三种不同方法对支原体的检测,了解实验用小型猪支原体感染情况,为今后实验用小型猪支原体检测方法国家标准的制定提供参考。方法采用培养法、PCR和ELISA方法分别对20头小型猪的气管、肺和血清进行检测。结果三种检测方法中,PCR方法支原体阳性检出率为15%,ELISA方法为20%,而培养法结果均为阴性。结论目前在普通级小型猪中存在支原体的感染。检测方法中PCR和ELISA方法较培养法更省时,敏感性更高。Objective Three common methods for detection of mycoplasma were used to identify mini-pigs infected with mycoplasma, in order to provide a reference for establishment of Mycoplasma detection methods in the national standards of laboratory miniature pigs. Methods Cell culture, PCR and ELISA techniques were employed to examine the trachea, lung and serum of 20 mini-pigs, respectively. Results The positive rate of mycoplasma detected by PCR was 15%, and detected by ELISA was 20%, but all negative by cell culture. Conclusions Mycoplasm infection is widely present in conventional mini-pigs at the present. PCR and ELISA techniques are more effective and time-saving than the cell culture method in detection of the mycoplasma infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222