3种脱敏剂治疗超声龈下刮治所致根面牙本质敏感症的疗效观察  

Clinical Effects of Three Kinds of Desensitizer on Root-dentin Hypersensitivity after Subgingival Scaling with Ultrasonic Instruments

作　　者：戴琳[1] 程波[2] 周杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉市第一医院口腔科,湖北武汉430022 [2]华中科技大学附属协和医院口腔科

出　　处：《口腔医学研究》2009年第1期87-89,共3页Journal of Oral Science Research

摘　　要：目的:评价极固宁、G lum a脱敏剂、75%氟化钠甘油治疗超声龈下刮治所致根面牙本质敏感症的临床疗效,探讨其作用机制。方法:将99例龈下刮冶术所致的774颗根面牙本质过敏症患牙随机分为3组,即极固宁脱敏组、G lum a脱敏剂组和氟化钠甘油脱敏组,分别进行脱敏治疗,观察即刻、1个月疼痛的VAS值。结果:极固宁脱敏组和G lum a脱敏剂的即刻有效率分别为94.32%、93.41%,显著优于氟化钠甘油脱敏组(71.83%),而脱敏后1个月,3组间无显著性差异。结论:极固宁、G lum a脱敏剂对治疗龈下刮治后产生的牙本质过敏有着较为理想疗效。Objective： To observe the clinical effects of Green OrTM, Gluma desensitizer and 75% sodium fluoride glycerin on the treatment of root - dentin hypersensitivity after subgingival scaling with ultrasonic instruments and discuss its desensitization mechanism. Methods： 774 dentin hypersensitivity teeth of 99 patients were randomly divided into three groups： Group A- Green OrTM, Group B - Gluma desensitizer, Group C -75% sodium fluoride glycerin. The results of desensitization in 3 groups were evaluated immediately and 1 month after treatment by using a visual analogue scale. Resuits ： The instant effects of Green OrTM （94.32%） and Gluma desensitizer（93.41% ） were better than that of sodium fluoride glycerin （71.83%）. One month later, there were no significant differences between 3 groups. Conclusion： The effect of preventing dental hypersensitiveness by using Green OrTM and Gluma desensitizer after subgingival scaling with uhrasonic instrument is ideal.

关 键 词：龈下刮治术 极固宁 GLUMA脱敏剂 氟化钠甘油 根面牙本质敏感症 

分 类 号：R781.2[医药卫生—口腔医学]