检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周红[1] 王月云[2] 张晓方[2] 敖薪[1] 龚爱萍[1] 蔡宇[3] 王靖[4]
机构地区:[1]长江大学医学院护理系,荆州434000 [2]长江大学医学院预防医学系,荆州434000 [3]长江大学附属医院科教科,荆州 [4]长江大学附属医院供应室,荆州
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2009年第1期15-18,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:湖北省教育厅人文社科类基金资助项目(2007Q016)
摘 要:目的了解不同学制护生应对方式的影响因素。方法采用应对方式问卷和一般情况问卷对290例不同学制的护生进行调查,所得资料采用SPSS13.0统计软件进行统计学分析。结果290名护士,积极应对得分(42.00±20.57),消极应对得分(34.00±13.24);在不同人口学特征方面:性别、学制、来源是否独生子女、父母文化程度对积极应对影响的差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论应该针对不同情况的护生,做到因人而异、不间断地进行心理辅导、咨询工作,并定期开展心理健康教育讲座和应对技能的训练,培养护生良好的应对方式。Objective To know the related factors of the coping styles of nursing students in different educational systems. Methods 290 nursing students with different educational systems were selected, then interviewed for the coping styles and general states by questionnaires. And the datum were analyzed with the SPSS 13.0. Results The score of active coping was ( 42.00 ±20.57 ) , and the score of negative coping was (34.00±13.24) in 290 nurses. Among the different demographic characteristics, sex, educational system, origin, whether or not only child and culture degree of parents had inlfuece to active coping, and there were significant differences for the coping styles ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions In order to cultivate the favorable coping style, the psychic-training and the eonsulation should be done uninterrupted, the lecture of mental health education and the the coping style training should be given regularly for the different students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249