检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》2009年第3期321-324,共4页Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70673050)
摘 要:为研究信息不对称下住房市场交易行为,得到供求双方交易信息成本的计算方法,该文利用北京市2000—2008年住房市场数据和Hedonic模型,对表征交易信息成本的参数进行估计,进而测算双方交易信息成本。研究表明:信息不对称对交易双方均会带来信息成本。供给方与需求方的交易信息成本分别为市场交易价格的15.2%和19.1%。这意味着:在信息不对称的住房市场中,需求方处于劣势地位。为降低供求双方交易信息成本,建议:拓展市场信息传递渠道,提高信息传递效率;加大对住房供给方的信息披露,弱化需求方的信息劣势程度。The transaction activities in a housing market with asymmetrical information were analyzed to estimate the transaction information costs of both the supply and demand sectors. Beijing housing market data from 2000 to 2008 was then input into a Hedonic model to estimate the variables affecting the transaction information costs. The results indicate that the asymmetrical information increases the information costs on both sides. The information cost for the supply sector is 15.2% of the transaction price while that for the demand sector is 19.1%, which shows that the demand sector is at a disadvantage in a housing market with asymmetrical information. Suggestions to reduce the information costs include improving the transmission channels of market information and the transmission efficiency to give more publicity to the supply sector; therefore, reduce the disadvantages on the demand side.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112