郑、何注《论语》的比较分析  

Comparative Analysis of Zheng's and He's Annotations on Lunyu

作　　者：乔秀岩[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学中国古代史研究中心,北京100871

出　　处：《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第2期86-92,共7页Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(200316)成果之一

摘　　要：郑注《论语》失传千年,20世纪陆续发现唐抄残卷,至今所得并诸书所引,已可恢复全书之半。本文持郑注《论语》与何晏等《论语集解》对照,探讨郑注之思路,分析《集解》之体例,论述其完全相反的鲜明特点。《集解》以荟萃汉魏训说之形态出现,先儒往往以《集解》为古注,与朱熹新注相对。其实,郑注在《论语》解释中建立他的经学体系,《集解》从《论语》解释中排除经学体系因素,两者背道而驰,较之《集解》与朱注之差距,有过之而无不及。郑注建立的结构,宏伟华丽,美轮美奂,值得品味。《集解》简易平板,本身无显著特色,只有与郑注对照,始见平易才是他们努力追求的目标。Zheng＇s annotation on Lunyu has been lost for a thousand years. In the twentieth century, the remnant volumes of the Tang transcription were discovered one after another, with which as well as the quotations in different books, half of the full view of Zheng＇ s annotation could be pieced together. Based on the comparative study of Zheng＇s annotation on Lunyu and He Yan＇s LunyuJijie, this study discusses the train of thought of Zheng＇ s annotation, and analyzes the style of LunyuJijie, for the purpose to expound the evident adverse features of the two. Jijie is presented as a work that assembles Han - Wei lectures. Zheng＇ s annotation attempted to establish his Jingxue system in the elaboration of Lunyu, while Jijie tried to exclude the element of Jingxue system from the interpretation. The composition structured in Zheng＇ s annotation is valuable for its magnificence, while Jijie is simple and plain, without distinguishing features. Only by a comparative study with Zheng＇ s annotation will it be clear that simplicity is the goal of Jijie.

关 键 词：郑玄 何晏 论语 比较 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]