检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾阳发[1] 李彬彬[1] 黄国富[1] 李月桃[1] 何明光[1]
机构地区:[1]眼科学国家重点实验室 中山大学中山眼科中心,广州510060
出 处:《中国实用眼科杂志》2009年第4期380-383,共4页Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的探讨眼前段光学相干断层扫描技术(anterior segment optical coherence tomography,AS—OCT)和A型超声波生物测量技术(A超)测量,中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)和前房深度(antefior chamber depth,ACD)的异同。方法分别采用AS—OCT和A超测量33名(54只眼)正常人的CCT和ACD,分别采用配对t检验、Pearson相关和Bland—Ahman方法,分析两种仪器的测量值的差异、相关性和一致性。结果A超与AS—OCT的CCT值分别为(524.41±23.24)um、(513.37±22.71)um,之间的差异有统计学意义(1=-15.906,P=0.000),差值均数为(11.04±5.10)um。两种仪器的CCT值正相关(r=0.976,P=0.000)。95%LoA(95% Limts of Agreement)为(-21.03,-1.04)um,95%LoA的区间范围为19.99um,为A超CCT平均值的3.81%。A超与AS—OCT的ACD值分别为(2.89±0.29)mm、(3.18±0.26)mm,之间的差异有统计学意义(t=-12.052,P=0.000),差值的均数为(-0.29±0.17)mm。两种仪器的ACD值相关(r=0.803,P=0.000)。95%LoA为(-0.63,-0.06)mm,95%LoA的区间范围为0.57mm,为A超ACD平均值的19.72%。结论AS-OCT的CCT值和ACD值与A超的测量值相关。与A超相比,AS—OCT的CCT测量值更小,而ACD值更大。两种仪器测量CCT的一致性比ACD高。Objective To assess central corneal thickness (CCT)and anterior chamber depth(ACD) measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT)comparing with A-scan ultrasonography (A-scan US ).Methods 54 eyes of 33 normal subjects were enrolled in the study.CCT and ACD were measured using AS-OCT and A-scan US.The measurements of two instruments were analyzed using paired t test,Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plot,respectively.Results The CCT of AS-OCT and A-scan US were 524.41±23.24 microm and 513.37±22.7 microm,respectively.The CCT values measured by A-scan US were significantly greater than AS-OCT,paired difference was 11.04± 5.10 microm (t =15.906, P =0.000).There were a significantly correlation between CCTs value of two instruments (r =0.976, P =0.000). The 95% LoA (95% Limts of Agreement )was -21.03 microm to -1.04 microm.The width of 95% LoA was 28 microm, 3.81% of the average pachymetry reading.The ACD of AS-OCT and A-scan US were 2.89± 0.29 mm and 3.18 ± 0.26 mm,respectively.The ACD values measured by AS-OCT were significantly greater than A-scan US, paired difference was -0.29±0.17 mm( t =- 12.052, P = 0.000 ).There were a significantly correlation between CCTs value of two instruments(r=0.803, P=0.000).The 95% LoA was -0.63 mm to -0.06 mm.The width of 95% LoA was 0.57 mm, 19.72% of the average A-scan reading.Conclusion CCT and ACD measured by AS-OCT were highly correlated with that from ultrasound pachymetry.In comparison with measurements of A-scan, CCT value of AS-OCT was lower, and the ACD was deeper.However, ACD readings by AS-OCT and A-scan were consistently less than that of CCT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28