检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州大学,江苏苏州215021
出 处:《河北公安警察职业学院学报》2007年第3期53-57,共5页Journal of Hebei Vocational College of Public Security Police
摘 要:检察制度是现代法治的标志之一,检察官更是被称为法律守护人。其拥有很大的权限,侦查权、公诉职能更是其核心部分。对于这些职能检察机关拥有很大的自由裁量权,因而肩负着实现追究犯罪与保障民权的神圣使命,也担负着落实国家刑事政策的任务。但是检察机关与案件无感情和经济上的切身利益,如何才能确保其为维护国家利益和人民利益而尽职尽责便是个十分重要的问题。我认为在于明确检察机关守护法律的动力机制,并加以恰当的引导。这就是我的出发点,我在考察分析了现代法治国家的动力机制后,对于我国检察制度的动力机制提出了自己的看法。Procurator system is a sign of law rule, and public prosecutor is also called Law Tutelary. Our public prosecutor has huge power, in which investigation power and public prosecuting power are central. Procurator organs can handle such power freely. So they should not only prosecute crimes and protect people but also carry out our country's criminal policy, but they gain no benefit from the cases. How to try their best is an important problem. We should make clear the dynamic mechanism of procurator organs to protect our laws and then give some proper guidance. The paper provides some suggestions as to the dynamic mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3