浅析米塞斯对经济科学的重建:基于韦伯的方法论视角  

On Mises's Reconstruction of the Sciences of Economics: in the View of Weber's Methodology of Social Science

作　　者：黄雄[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学经济学院,上海200433

出　　处：《湖北经济学院学报》2009年第2期18-23,共6页Journal of Hubei University of Economics

摘　　要：马克思.韦伯与米塞斯都是德语世界中对社会科学有卓越贡献的学者,他们不仅仅私交甚好,而且在思想上尤其是方法论上也有许多相互倾慕之处。但是,至今也很少有学者从韦伯的方法论这一视角来审视米塞斯的经济学方法论思想及其他所倡导的人类行为科学的重建。本文试图探讨韦伯的方法论思想与米塞斯独特的经济学方法论及其后来极力倡导人类行为学的先验观点之间的关系,一方面介绍韦伯所提出的客观性、理想类型和"理解"的方法对米塞斯重建经济科学之思想的影响,另一方面也阐明米塞斯对韦伯方法论的一些不同意见,并基于批判性的吸取韦伯的这些方法论观点的同时,继承和发展门格尔理论与历史的二分法,从而试图重建纯理论性的经济科学——"人类行为学"。Max Weber and Ludwig von Mises are two great scholars who have outstanding contributions of social science in German language world. They had not only a good friendship in private, but also a great deal of common ideas with each other on their ideology, especially the methodology of social science. However, until now, just few scholars examined Mises^s methodology of economics and the reconstruction of the Sciences of Human Action from the perspective of Weber＇s methodology. This paper attempts to discuss the relationship between Weber＇s methodology and Mises＇s unique methodology of eco- nomics which later was labeled with praxiology by him. On the one hand, it pays close attention to the impact on Mises by the thoughts from Weber＇s thoughts such as the objectivity of social science, the ideal type, and the method of ＂Verstehen＂ （German, means understanding）; On the other hand, it also clarifies the different ideas to Weber＇s methodology from Mises＇s view. Thus, being based on the critical absorption of Weber＇s methodology, Mises inherited and developed Menger＇s dichotomy of theory and history, which attempted to re-establish the pure theory in the science of human action-praxiology.

关 键 词：韦伯 米塞斯 方法论 理解 人类行为学 

分 类 号：F09[经济管理—政治经济学]