检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘菲[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《山西警官高等专科学校学报》2009年第2期35-38,共4页Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy
摘 要:我国现行的行政强制执行制度存在许多弊端,尤其是在行政强制执行的分配模式上出现了一些混乱。要厘清行政强制执行权分配的模式问题,就必须首先弄清该权力的属性,即该权力到底是行政权还是司法权。应当注意的是,权力的性质与行使是两个不同的问题,在确定行政强制执行权的性质后,应当根据我国实际情况,将行政强制执行权授予相关机关。在探索这些问题的过程中,对于如何构建符合我国国情的行政强制执行的分配模式也就比较清晰了。There are some defects in our present administrative enforcement by force, some confusion on the allocation model of admistrative enforcement by force in particular. In order to make clear the matters on allocation models of admistrative enforcement by force, we must make clear the characteristic of the power, that is to say whether it is administrative or legislative power. It is the key to know the nature and the performance of the power are two different matters. After the nature of it is determined, the power of adminis- trative enforcement by force should be given to corresponding organs according to our real situation. Through the analysis on these problems,how to build allocation model of admistrative enforcement by force which adapts to our real conditions is clear.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.186