检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱艳英[1]
出 处:《云南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第1期5-11,共7页Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Social Science)
基 金:国家社科基金项目(07CFX036)
摘 要:基于法律多元的视角,西南少数民族地区元代以前在王朝国家羁縻统治下形成了以固有纠纷解决机制为主的多元纠纷解决机制;元代在土官土司制下则发生重大变迁,国家司法制度在西南地区的适用范围和对象不断扩张,固有纠纷解决机制的地位和效力置于国家法之下;明中后期至清中期西南少数民族固有纠纷解决机制急剧变迁,与国家正式司法制度不断整合,王朝国家司法制度普遍适用,形成西南少数民族地区纠纷解决机制在多元交错中的非均衡变迁。As a member of plural dispute resolving mechanism in ethnic region of Southwest China, local mechanism had formed the principal dispute resolving mechanism before Yuan dynasty because every central government adapted to the untied ruling. The important changes of dispute resolving mechanism happened in Yuan dynasty, formal jurisdiction of central government expanded gradually, instead the effect of local mechanism decreased. Local mechanism happened radical changes in communicating with formal jurisdiction application in Ming and Qing dynasty. It made plural dispute resolving mechanism form unequal changes in ethnic region of Southwest China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229