检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东南大学医学院附属江阴医院,江苏省江阴市214400
出 处:《职业与健康》2009年第9期997-998,共2页Occupation and Health
摘 要:目的探讨多奈哌齐治疗脑卒中后失语的疗效和安全性。方法脑卒中后失语患者62例,随机分为多奈哌齐治疗组(31例)及对照组(31例)。治疗组给予多奈哌齐5mg,1次/d,共8周;对照组用安慰剂(维生素C)1片,1次/d,采用西方成套测验(WAB)和交流能力问卷(CAL)评定患者语言功能和日常生活交流能力。结果治疗后,治疗组WAB、CAL评分明显高于治疗前,与对照组相比,WAB中的口语表达、听理解、复述、命名,均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.70,4.32,2.57,4.53,均P<0.01),CAL分值差异亦有统计学意义(t=2.89,P<0.01)。治疗组无明显不良反应。结论多奈哌齐治疗卒中后失语安全有效。[ Objective] To discuss the efficacy and safety of donepezil in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia. [ Methods ] 62 patients with post-stroke aphasia were divided into donepezil group ( n =31) and control group ( n =31 ) randomly. The patients of donepezil group were given 5mg donepezil once a day for 8 weeks, and the control group was treated with 1 tablet vitamin C once a day. The language function and communication ability in daily life of patients were evaluated by WAB and CAL. [ Results ] The WAB and CAL scores of donepezil group in post-treatment were higher than that in pre-treatment. There were significant differences in WAB scores (oral expression, auditory comprehension, retelling and naming } between donepezil group and control group ( t = 2.70,4.32,2.57,4.53, P 〈 0. 01 }. The difference in CAL score was significant ( t = 2.89, P 〈 0.01 ). There was no obvious adverse reaction in donepezil group. [ Conclusion] Donepezil is effective and safety in the treatment of stroke aphasia.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15