中药治疗文拉法辛所致消化系统不良反应  被引量:1

Traditional Chinese drug to treat the digestive side effects caused by venlafaxine

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李秀坤[1] 马尔格亚[1] 张薇[1] 安莉萍[1] 王红云[1] 

机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院,乌鲁木齐830000

出  处:《临床精神医学杂志》2009年第2期125-126,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

摘  要:目的:探讨中药治疗文拉法辛所致消化道不良反应。方法:选取抑郁症患者70例,随机分为中药组(37例)和对照组(33例)。两组均用文拉法辛治疗,前者加用中药,后者用空白方治疗其不良反应。以汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、康奈尔医学指数(CMI)及治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)观察疗效和不良反应。结果:中药组和对照组在治疗前与治疗4周经HAMD、HAMA评定,两组减分值差异无显著性(P>0.05),两组的CMI在治疗前与治疗4周的减分值差异有显著性(F=4.29,P<0.05);TESS量表测评在治疗1周与治疗4周的减分值两组差异有显著性(F=4.52,P<0.05)。结论:中药对文拉法辛所致消化道不良反应有较好疗效。Objective: To research the traditional Chinese drug to treat the digestive side effects caused by venlafaxine. Method :70 depressive patients were divided into Chinese drug group(37 cases)and control group (33 cases)randomly. All the patients were treated by venlafaxine with traditional medicine and placebo re- spectively and their therapeutic effects and side effects were evaluated by Hamilton depression scale( HAMD), Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA)and treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS). Results:There were no sig- nificant difference( P 〉0.05 )between HAMD and HAMA in both groups before and after treatments,Evaluation of CMI had significant difference between the two groups before and after 4 weeks treatment ( F = 4. 29, P 〈 0. 05 ). There were significant difference between the two groups in TESS after 1 and 4 weeks treatment( F =4. 52, P 〈 0.05). Conclusion: Chinese drugs is effective on treating digestive side effects caused by venlafaxine.

关 键 词:抑郁症 中药 抗抑郁剂 不良反应 

分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象