检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦国荣[1]
出 处:《西部法学评论》2009年第2期55-63,共9页Western Law Review
基 金:笔者主持的国家社会科学基金项目<劳动权保障与〈劳动法〉的修改>的中期成果;项目批准号:05BFX026
摘 要:我国现有的劳动立法对劳动合同法定必备条款的设计存在着诸多问题:一是将劳动基准强制立法内容规定为双方可以约定的内容;二是过分限制了双方可以自由约定的权利;三是相当部分条款的规定在立法上存在着重复与矛盾之处。这就要求立法者应当以尊重劳资双方当事人意思自治、维护劳资伦理合作关系、在平衡和保护双方利益关系及当事人正当权利的基础上适当向劳动者倾斜、明确劳动基准强制性立法与劳动合同必备条款授权性立法内容之间的范围及其相互关系等为基本原则,重新设定劳动合同的法定必备条款。There are a lot of problems on labor contract essential items existing in our labor legislation design, the first of which is the compulsive contents of labor standards in the mandatory legislation that can be negotiated by the parties, the second is extra restriction on rights of the contracting parties, the third is the duplication and inconsistencies of many provisions. This requires legislators should respect the autonomy of the labor parties, maintain ethical cooperative relations between employers and employees, adequately tilts to the latter on the basis of balancing and protecting the interests and rights of the contracting parties, explicitly define the scope and relationship of the labor compulsive provisions and the labor contractual essential terms, reset labor contract essential legal provisions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15