检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵江月[1] 孙琦[1] 陆博[1] 马立威[1] 张劲松[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学眼科医院中国医科大学附属第四医院眼科辽宁省晶状体学重点实验室,110005
出 处:《中国实用眼科杂志》2009年第5期456-458,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的评价双手法微切口白内障摘除联合1.4mm微切口人工晶体植入手术技术的安全性、有效性及其术后早期视功能恢复情况。方法选择2004年8月至2006年12月行老年性白内障摘除手术的患者320只眼,随机分成两组,A组进行常规3.Omm切口同轴超声乳化白内障摘除手术,B组进行微切口白内障摘除手术(MICS)。术后一个月对两组术眼进行以下检查:裸眼远、近视力;最佳矫正远、近视力;自动验光仪验光观察角膜散光;全眼像差变化,并比较两组的差异。结果术后1个月两组裸眼远视力有统计学差异,术后1个月两组手术前后散光变化有统计学意义(P〈0.05),全眼总像差及高阶相差A组均高于B组,MICS组的观察结果优于常规同轴超声乳化组。结论微切口白内障手术作为一种新的超声乳化手术技巧会逐渐发展完善,在临床中得到进一步应用。Objective To evaluate the safety, efficiency,and vision recovery process about bimanual microinsicion cataract extraction with 1.4mm intraocular lens insertion at early stage of post operation.Methods Three hundred and twenty age related cataract eyes were randomly assigned to two groups from Aug, 2004 to Dec, 2006.Group A performed standard coaxial phacoemulsification with 3.0mm incision, Group B performed MICS.We evaluated UCVA, BCVA, corneal astigmatism and wavefront aberration one month postoperation. Results There's statistical significance in uncorrected visual acuity and corneal astigmatism of one month postoperation between two groups (P 〈0.05 ).For group A, the total wavefront and high order wavefront were higher than group B. MICS group were better than standard coaxial phaco emulsification.Conclusion MICS is a new kind of technique of phacoemulsification.MICS will be performed in more patients at clinic with its good results and developments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.123.254