检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学语言与认知研究中心,浙江杭州310028 [2]杭州电子科技大学人文学院,浙江杭州310012
出 处:《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2009年第3期27-33,共7页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
摘 要:行动效用主义是传统的效用主义形式,而规则效用主义则是新效用主义的主要代表。在两种理论之间集中了很多关注和争论。作为复兴了效用主义的新理论形态,规则效用主义一方面给效用计算问题带来了新的困境,但另一方面却对处理效用主义与道义论的关系问题具有重要意义,即引发了效用主义对道义论的调和关系。然而,这种新的理论动向并未获得行动效用主义一方的认可和支持,因为后者明确反对像"道义论"那样以规则作为道德评判的直接标准。Act-utilitarianism is a traditional form introduces new contents into the modern form of representation of teleology in moral philosophy, great effects on human life. However, problems util uti an between act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. 0 problems and difficulties to the calculation of utility; role on the relationship between deontology and util of utilitarianism, while rule-utilitarianism itarianism, thus refreshes this theory. As a litarianism is an important theory and has d difficulties still exist, such as the debate n one hand, rule-utilitarianism on the other hand, it also p itarianism, to which act-ut ays brings new a significant litarianism does not consent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249