检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘云生[1] 魏奉才[1] 郭建平[1] 袁奎封[1]
机构地区:[1]山东医科大学附属医院口腔颌面外科
出 处:《中国疼痛医学杂志》1998年第1期1-5,共5页Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
摘 要:采用随机平行分组,双盲,单剂量方法比较了169名患者埋伏阻生齿拔除术后5种不同镇痛方案的镇痛效果。发现镇痛效果由小到大依次为:阿斯匹林0.6或氨基比林0.6<APC0.76<强痛定60mg<阿斯匹林0.6+咖啡因0.1+扑尔敏4mg。作者认为虽然新型的镇痛剂不断出现,对于阻生齿拔除术后产生的局部疼痛,传统的解热镇痛剂与咖啡因和抗组胺药合理组合。This study compared the analgesic effects of five prescriptions in 169 patients by parallel group, double blind design after their third unerupted molars were extracted. The results showed that the power of analgesic effects can be arranged as follows: Asprin 0.6 or Amidazophen 0.6< APC 0.76 < Butylcinnamylpyrazin 60mg <Asprin 0.6 combined with Coffein 0.1 and Chlortrimeton 4mg. It is concluded that although new analgesics appeared frequently, the conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs combined with coffein and antihistamine druge are still effective methods for the control of the pain elicited by the extraction of the unerupted third molars.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28