检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱卫娟[1] 范俭雄[1] 周群[1] 高晓宁[1]
出 处:《四川精神卫生》2009年第2期78-80,共3页Sichuan Mental Health
基 金:南京医科大学科技发展基金(NY04043)
摘 要:目的评价无抽搐电休克治疗(MECT)对认知功能的影响。方法对24例精神疾病患者在MECT前及MECT后5~7天内进行威斯康星卡片分类、连线试验A和B、数字广度、数字符号和临床记忆量表等神经心理学测验。结果①威斯康星卡片分类中,患者完成的总应答数(Ra)在MECT治疗后较治疗前显著减少(P<0.05);②连线试验A和B中,患者完成时间在MECT治疗后较治疗前显著缩短(P<0.05);③数字广度中,患者在MECT治疗后较治疗前显著增加(P<0.05);④数字符号中,患者在MECT治疗后较治疗前差异无显著性(P>0.05);⑤临床记忆量表中各项指标,患者在MECT治疗后较治疗前差异均无显著性(P均>0.05);⑥精神疾病患者在MECT治疗后精神症状得到控制,病情恢复良好。结论MECT对认知功能无明显损害,对重性精神障碍患者疗效好。Objective To estimate the effects of modified electric convulsive therapy(MECT) on cognitive function. Method Twenty- four participants were assessed by Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), trail making test A and B, Digit Span Test( DST), Digit -Symbol Substitution Test and Clinical Memory Score(CMS) at pre - and post - MECT. Results The total trials of WCST were significantly reduced at post - treatment than pre - treatment ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; In trail making test A and B,the finished - time was significantly shorter at post - treatment than pre - treatment ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; In DST, there were significantly improved after treatment than before( P 〈 0. 05 ) ;No significant difference was observed between pre -treatment and post- treatment in Digit -Symbol Substitution Test( P 〉0. 05 ) ;No significant difference was observed between pre- treatment and post- treatment in the Clinical Memory Score( all P 〉 0. 05 ) ;Psychiatric symptoms were well- controlled and pathogenetic condition had good improvement. Conclusion MECT do not damage the cognitive function signifieantly;MECT have good therapeutic effect on multiplicity mental disorder patients.
分 类 号:R749.054[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R749.3[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200