批评性报道的法律意识调查  

A Survey on Legal Consciousness and Judicial Circumstances of Critical Reports

作　　者：陈堂发[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学新闻传播学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2009年第3期142-146,共5页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"批评性报道的法律问题研究"阶段性成果(项目批准号:06BXW023)

摘　　要：在批评报道经常涉及的谴责、贬斥态度呈现上,法官理解与掌握的法律尺度与编辑记者相比,更倾向于意见、情绪表达的理智与分寸;媒体从业者对报道"客观性"尊重这个问题上,更多地采取"新闻构成要素基本真实即可"的行业标准,法官面对媒体因实际条件限制而难以达到理想状态的客观、真实时,倾向于将苛刻的客观性要求置于优先地位。As regards the debunking and accusatory attitude as manifest in coverage of critical reports, judges tend to approach and interpret law in more rational and appropriate terms than do journalists who prefer emotional and subjective expression. Media people go by the professional criterion that “constitutive components of news are basically true”, when it comes to media objectivity. Judges, however, are inclined to priotize strict objectivity when exposed to media and confronting actual constraints that work against ideal objectivity.

关 键 词：批评报道 法律意识 报道侵权 认知分歧 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]