三种根充糊剂在根管治疗中的临床疗效观察  

Clinical Observation of Three Kinds of Paste Filler in Root Canal Therapy

作　　者：朱兴国[1] 钟兆伟[1] 张蕾[1] 曹涛[1] 贾丛辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属口腔医院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《黑龙江医学》2009年第3期217-218,共2页Heilongjiang Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的比较三种根充糊剂在根管治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取临床需根管治疗的患牙316颗,随机分为3组,分别采用AH PLUS糊剂+牙胶尖、VITAPEX糊剂+牙胶尖、氧化锌丁香油糊剂+牙胶尖进行根充,并对3组术后1 d、3 d、7 d的临床疗效进行比较分析。结果术后AH PLUS组与VITAPEX组疼痛发生率较氧化锌组低,有显著性差异(P<0.05),而AH PLUS与VITAPEX组无显著性差异。结论AHPLUS糊剂和VITAPEX糊剂可以有效地减轻根充术后急性反应,是值得推广的新型根充材料。Objective To compare the clinically curative effects of three kinds of paste filler in root canal therapy. Methods 316 theeth which need root canal therapy were selected and randomly divided into three groups, They were used respectively in three groups of root canal therapy： AH PLUS ＋ gutta - percha, VITAPEX ＋ gutta - percha and zinc oxide eugenol paste ＋ gutta - percha, and the clinically curative effects of three groups after 1 day, 3 days and 7 days were analyzed comparatively. Results The pain incidence of AH PLUS group and VITAPEX group were lower than that of zinc oxide eugenol group , and there was significant difference between them（ P 〈 0.05）,but there was no significant difference between AH PLUS group and VITAPEX group. Conclusion AH PLUS paste and V1TAPEX paste can effec- tively reduce the acute reaction after root canal therapy, and they should be Spreaded widely in clinic as the new root filling materials.

关 键 词：根充糊剂 根管充填 术后疼痛 临床分析 

分 类 号：R781.3[医药卫生—口腔医学]