代表人诉讼制度设计缺陷  

The Design Flaws of the Representative Litigation

作　　者：吴英姿[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2009年第2期66-78,共13页The Jurist

基　　金：章武生教授主持的福特基金项目"解决群体性纠纷的理论与实践"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：实证调查表明,代表人诉讼制度不是法院处理群体纠纷案件的唯一方式。当事人人数多少及其相互关系、案件类型、审判成本、外部压力等都是影响法院处理群体纠纷方式的因素。代表人诉讼制度设计存在明显缺陷,导致这个在理论上和立法上被赋予高度期待的制度在实际运作中遭遇重重障碍,群体纠纷案件处理结果成为多方力量博弈的产物。该制度的缺陷提醒我们:法治建设过程中不能抛开国外法律制度产生的特定历史背景、文化基础和制度环境,简单化理解,甚至曲解他国立法,"为我所用"式地盲目借鉴。Empirical investigation shows that the representative litigation is not the only way which the court uses to deal with group dispute cases. The factors that affect the court deal with the group dispute cases include the number of parties and their relationship, the types of cases, the cost of the trial, the external pressure. There are obvious design flaws in representative litigation system, which led to many obstacles to the actual operation of the system, although people have been granted a high expectation on Legislative and theory. In fact, the results of the group disputes cases often become a product of multi-power game. The shortcomings of the system remind us that in the construction of rule of law we cannot abandon the specific historical perspective, cultural and institutional foundation for the environment of the overseas legal regime; neither make it oversimplification nor learn it for the use of us.

关 键 词：代表人诉讼制度 群体诉讼 司法的边界 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] D922.181[政治法律—法学]