检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州大学水利与环境学院,河南郑州450002 [2]中原工学院计算机学院,河南郑州450007
出 处:《采矿与安全工程学报》2009年第1期50-54,共5页Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering
基 金:国家杰出青年科学基金项目(19625205)
摘 要:为了克服常规粒子群算法(PSO)应用于岩土工程弹塑性反演时搜索效率较低、计算工作量大的缺点,通过对算法中适应值比较方式和粒子运动模式的深入分析,指出了其中存在的制约搜索效率的内在因素,并提出相应修改策略,在此基础上形成一种新的改进粒子群算法(IPSO);将新算法用于岩土材料弹塑性参数反演,结果表明,与常规粒子群算法相比,改进算法明显提高了参数的搜索效率,利用较少的迭代次数就能得到满足精度要求的结果,从而减小了岩土工程弹塑性反分析的计算量,是一种可行的参数反演方法.In order to offset the disadvantages of low searching efficiency and large amount of calculation using traditional PSO for elastoplastic back analysis in geotechnical engineering,the comparison method of fitness value and the motion mode of individual particle of traditional PSO are analyzed and the internal factors which restrict searching efficiency pointed out.Then some corresponding improvement measures are proposed.On this basis,an improved PSO(IPSO) is put forward and used for elastoplastic parameters inverse.The results show that,compared with traditional PSO,the parameter searching efficiency and the convergence precision of IPSO have an obvious increase and the inverse results meeting accuracy requirements can be obtained with less number of iterations.Thus the calculation amount for elastplastic back analysis can be greatly reduced if using IPSO.So our proposed algorithm is a feasible method for elastoplastic back analysis in geotechnical engineering.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145