试论证明责任承担和法官裁判的不同原理——以刑事诉讼中法官庭外调查权为视角  

On Different Principles of Proving Responsibility Borne and Judges' Verdict——A Perspective of Judges' Investigation Rights Beyond Court in Criminal Suits

作　　者：阎朝秀[1] 

机构地区：[1]成都理工大学文法学院,四川成都610059

出　　处：《内江师范学院学报》2009年第5期26-30,共5页Journal of Neijiang Normal University

摘　　要：在刑事诉讼中法官进行庭外调查,不是在承担证明责任,而是在履行裁判职责。证明责任的承担和裁判职责的履行在前提、立场、动因和结果上都有较大的不同。因此,法官不是证明责任的主体,法官进行庭外调查是在履行其裁判职责。The judge who makes investigation outside the court in a criminal suit is not bearing the responsibility to prove something. Instead, he is taking up his duty as judge. There exist great differences between proving the responsibility borne and judges＇ verdict in either their premises, or their standpoints, or their motives, or their consequences. Accordingly, the judge is not the person who hears certain responsibility to prove something. The investigation made by him outside the court is actually what his duty requires.

关 键 词：庭外调查 证明责任 裁判职责 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]