检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张国良[1] 候锐[2] 秦瑞峰[2] 周宏志[2] 胡开进[2]
机构地区:[1]西安第四军医大学口腔医院麻醉科,710032 [2]西安第四军医大学颌面外科,710032
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2009年第3期425-427,共3页Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的:观察56例牙科畏惧症小儿行拔牙手术时采用靶控输注(target controlled infusion,TCI)异丙酚镇静的效果,探讨靶控输注镇静剂方式在牙科畏惧症小儿拔牙时的安全性及适用性。方法:56例牙科畏惧症拔牙小儿静脉TCI异丙酚,血浆靶控浓度设定为1.5μg/ml,测定镇静后拔牙时小儿心率(HR)及脉搏氧(SpO2),并测量镇静值,与拔牙前测量值进行比较。结果:小儿在拔牙时的HR轻度下降,SpO2在实施TCI镇静剂前后无显著变化,小儿均处于中度镇静状态,Ramsay镇静评分5.2±0.8,镇静评分前后比较有显著意义。结论:TCI镇静技术用于小儿牙科畏惧症拔牙术具有良好的镇静效果,对呼吸及循环系统无明显影响,适用于小儿拔牙术中畏惧症的控制和治疗。Objective: To observer the sedative effects in 56 dental fear children who were treated by target controlled infusion propofol for teeth extractions. Methods: Sedation in 56 dental fear children was induced by target controlled infusion of propofol and the predicted drug concentration was 1.5 μg/ml. The HR, SpO2 and scores of sedation were measured and compared before and after TCI sedation. Results: Heart rates of the patients decreased slightly during operation, but there was no significant changes in heat rate and SpO2 before and after TCI sedation. Children were on the middle sedation states. Ramsay sedation score was 5.2 ± 0.8, which was significantly different compared with that before TCI sedation. Conclusion: Target controlled infusion propofol sedation in dental fear children for dental extractions is effective, which has no obvious impact on respiration and circulation system. It is feasible in the management and treatment of dental fear during teeth extraction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222