小儿唇裂修复中粘合剂粘合与传统缝合的对比研究  

The treatment of the wounds of cheilorrhaphy:a comparative research between the EPIGLU and the traditional method

作　　者：张文广[1] 梁杰[1] 吴志贤[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东医学院附属医院整形外科,524001

出　　处：《中国实用医药》2009年第15期3-4,共2页China Practical Medicine

基　　金：广东省自然科学基金资助项目(项目编号:01-1771);广东省医学科研基金资助项目(项目编号:B2005105)

摘　　要：目的对比研究爱必肤粘合剂与传统缝合方法对唇裂修复术白唇手术切口的作用。方法将同期的小儿唇裂手术随机分组,32例白唇切口皮肤予爱必肤粘合,32例白唇切口皮肤按传统方法予丝线缝合,观察切口疼痛程度、愈合情况、感染率及美观效果。结果爱必肤组切口疼痛率低(χ2=9.69,P<0.01),切口及针眼疤痕不明显(χ2=7.59,P<0.01),切口甲级愈合率及感染率两组差异无统计学意义。结论爱必肤作为关闭切口皮肤的一种方法,在小儿唇裂手术中值得大力推广。Objective To compare and explore the influence of epiglu with the traditional method in treating the wound of cheilorrhaphy. Methods In this study,64 eleft lip patients were divided randomly into two groups. 32 white lip wounds were treated by epiglu, and 32 white lip wounds were treated by suture. The pain of wounds, the wound＇ s heal, the ratio of wound＇ s infeetion and the sear were observed individually. Results Compared with the the pain of the wounds and the sear,the epigul group was superior to the suture group obviously. The two methods had no differences in the ratio of wound＇ s infection and the ratio of the first rate heal. Conclusion As a method for closure wound, epiglu deserve to use in cheilorrhaphy.

关 键 词：爱必肤 缝合 唇裂修复术 

分 类 号：R782.2[医药卫生—口腔医学]