检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李慧林[1]
出 处:《体育学刊》2009年第5期49-52,共4页Journal of Physical Education
基 金:2008年河南省教育厅骨干教师资助项目
摘 要:通过对高等学校与科研院所学位与研究生教育评估所、中国网大、武汉大学科学评价研究中心和广东管理科学院科学学研究所4家社会组织和研究机构关于我国体育学学科评估(排名)结果的研究,指出当前的学科评估存在的问题:评估的目的不同、评估理论研究不足、没有针对性的评估指标体系、体育学科的不同层次采用相同的评估指标体系;参评的对象与评估结果代表性不足;评估结果起伏较大;每年一轮的评估不符合学科建设与发展的规律。By studying the evaluation (rating) of the science of physical education discipline carried out in China by such 4 social organizations and research institutes as Higher Learning and Research Institute Degree and Graduate Education Evaluation Institute, China Network University, Science Evaluation Research Center of Wuhan University, and Science Research Institute of Guangdong Management Science Institute, the author pointed out the following problems existing in current disciplinary evaluation: the evaluation organizations have different purposes for the evaluation of the physical education discipline; the evaluation organizations have done inadequate researches on theories about disciplinary evaluation; there is not an evaluation index system established specifically for the evaluation of the physical education discipline; the same evaluation index system is used for different levels of the physical education discipline; the objects and results of the evaluation of the physical education discipline is not adequately representative; the results of the evolution (rating) of the physical education discipline vary greatly; the yearly evaluation is not in conformity with the pattern of disciplinary construction and development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4