《红楼梦》64、67两回可能非原作之一证  

One Piece of Evidence that Chapters 64 and 67 Are Not the Original Version

作　　者：严安政[1] 

机构地区：[1]渭南师范学院中文系,陕西渭南714000

出　　处：《咸阳师范学院学报》2009年第3期67-68,73,共3页Journal of Xianyang Normal University

摘　　要：从《红楼梦》文本实际出发,通过对《红楼梦》前80回,尤其是61回到70回中"忙"和"连忙"使用情况的考察,认为64、67两回和前80回其他章回可能不是出于同一作者之手,而和后40回可能同属一个作者,而且这个作者可能还不是高鹗。From the perspective of the actual text of A Dream of Red Mansions, through a survey of the use of ＂business＂ and ＂hurriedness＂ in the previous eighty chapters, Chapters 61 to 67 in particular, it is thought that Chapters 64 and 67 and the former eighty chapters are not written by one author, while the latter 40 chapters might belong to the same author. Moreover, the author might not be Gao E.

关 键 词：《红楼梦》 64 67两回 非原作 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]