检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁光明[1]
出 处:《中国民康医学》2009年第11期1241-1242,共2页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:比较齐拉西酮与喹硫平治疗早期精神分裂症的疗效及不良反应。方法:96例符合CCMD-3的精神分裂症患者随机分为两组各48例,分别给予齐拉西酮和喹硫平治疗8周,采用阳性症状与阴性症状量表(PANSS)及不良反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:治疗8周后,齐拉西酮组的显效率为83.33%,有效率为95.83%;喹硫平组的显效率为81.25%,有效率93.75%。两组疗效无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。齐拉西酮组的不良反应发生率为20.83%,喹硫平组为22.92%,两组无显著性差异(P〉0.05),齐拉西酮组的泌乳素水平低于喹硫平组,有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。结论:齐拉西酮和利培酮对精神分裂症的总体疗效相当,但齐拉西酮对阴性症状的效果更好,齐拉西酮的不良反应与喹硫平相似,但齐拉西酮更适合女性患者。Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of Ziprasidone and Quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods:98 patients with schizophrenia were stochastic allocated to two groups treated with Ziprasidone and Quetiapine for 8 weeks. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Treatment Emergent Side Effect Scale were used to evaluate the efficacy and side effects. Results: The significant efficacy rates of Ziprasidone was 83.33% and the efficacy rates was 95.83% after 8 weeks, while that was 81.25% and 93.75% in Quetiapine group. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05). The incidence rate of adverse effect was 20.83% in Ziprasidone group and that was 22.92% in Quetiapine group, and there was not a significant difference between them (P 〉 0.05 ). The level of PRL in Ziprasidone was lower than that of Quetiapine. Conclusions: Ziprasidone is as effective and safe as Quetiapine for the treatment of schizophrenia, but Ziprasidone had a better effect for negative symptoms than Quetiapine. The side effects of Ziprasidone are similar to Quetiapine. However, Ziprasidone was more suitable for women patients.
分 类 号:R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.205.205