检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘白明[1,2]
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学公共管理学院 [2]江西财经大学人文学院
出 处:《史学月刊》2009年第6期118-125,共8页Journal of Historical Science
摘 要:近十年来,中国古代公正思想研究取得了重大进展。主要表现在:首先是对中国古代公正思想的特点进行了概括,为后续研究打下了初步基础。其次,对汉以后古代统治者如何在实践上贯彻公正理念进行了较为详细的探讨。再次,大体指出了中国古代公正思想的积极意义、理论缺陷及转型思路。然而,就整体而言,中国古代公正思想研究尚存有研究兴趣不浓,资料梳理不足,研究理论和研究方法欠缺,以及未能构建一个完整研究框架等不足之处,需要深入反思来促进该研究的发展。Over the past decade, the studies of justice thought in ancient China have made significant progress, which manifested mainly in the followings. Firstly, researchers summarized the characteristics of justice thoughts in ancient China to set up the initial foundation for the later research. Secondly, they undertook a much detailed study on how to implement fair idea in practice by rulers after the Han Dynasty. Again, they pointed out the positive significance, theoretical defects and rough idea of the transition. However, on the whole, there were some deficiencies, such as weak research interests, lack of sorting out information, lack of research theory and method and failing to construct a complete research framework, which requests us to deeply reflect to promote the development of the study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28