论Geltung  

On Geltung

作　　者：戚渊[1] 

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院副教授、法学博士

出　　处：《中国法学》2009年第3期53-63,共11页China Legal Science

摘　　要：本文对哈贝马斯"Faktizitt und Geltung"(《事实性与有效性》)一书中的Geltung概念进行了分析。作者首先指出了英、中译本对Geltung概念的误读,认为Facts或"事实"不等于Faktizitat或"事实性";Norms或"规范"只是Geltung概念的涵义和意义的一部分。其次分析了哈贝马斯Geltung概念的涵义、意义和问题。作者指出了哈贝马斯Geltung概念内部存在的三个层次的矛盾,并认为他的Geltung概念的模糊性在于他的社会与国家之关系的模糊性。最后提出了如何理解法律的有效性问题。作者认为,Geltung概念是事实性、规范性与价值性的统一体。内在于法律本身的事实性与有效性之间的关系并不是对立统一的矛盾关系,而是包含的种属关系。合法性的有效性来源于人类社会某些确定的先在内容(比如人性尊严之类的天赋人权、人类生存的基本公理等)。它们是先于立法的,是"侵犯禁止"的先在条款。The author analyses the concept of Gehung in＂ Faktizitat and Geltung＂ by Habermas. First of all, the author points out the misunderstandings of the concept of Geltung in British and Chinese translation and thinks that Facts or＂事实＂ does not mean Faktizitzat 或＂事实性＂ and that Norms or＂ 规范＂ is just a part of the meaning and significance of the concept of Geltung. Second, the author analyese the meaning and significance and issues of Habermas＇ Gehung. The author points out that the existence of the three levels of internal contradictions of Geltung itself. Finally, how to understand the validity of the law. The author thinks that the concept of Geltung is a unity of Faktizitat and Normativeness and Value. The immanent relation between Faktizitat und Geltung of law itself is not the contradictory relation of unity of opposities, but rather included relation between species and genus. The validity of legitimacy is from some identified and inherent contents such as the inherent rights and the basic axiom.

关 键 词：Geltung规范性 正当性 主体间性 实践理性 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]